• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average


DISCUSSION CCIE R&S v5 LAB Exam Takers Review 13 March 2017
1
Old TS :

ticket 1 :  under SW2 vlan 12 there was access list which was dropping the traffic from pc to server . Allowed it .
ticket 2 :  encap frame relay and whole ppp was missing from r17 se4/0 . added all .
ticket 3 :  in r22 , router-id 123.5.5.5 . and in r5 passive interface towards r1 .
ticket 4 :  r12 passive interface towards r14 .
ticket 5 :  one of r1 interface mpls ip missing and under route-map in r5 added a forward sequence to get rid of wrong next hop .
ticket 6 :  network was missing in r25 added it . Also at r22 and r25 neighbor was not made under address family  ipv6 and applied given route-map .
ticket 7 :  in r14 connected to r18 access-list blocking esp , udp allowed it . ip nhrp shortcut added in r18 and r19 (they mentioned this ticket has 2 faults
but has 3 as per me )
ticket 8 : in mpls trace was asked from r104 to r107 but through. r104 was not getting ip from dhcp . SW3 vlan 100 was not under ospf .
            increased ospf cost r4 and r6 . IN r8 int e0/0.124 ip nat inside was missing .
            But again here they said 2 faults but i found 4 .
ticket 9 :  in 21 under added udp isakmp and non-500 isakmp .
ticket 10 : NAS was getting wrong ip , changed the client identifier under dhcp in r23 . also e0/0 of nas : ip address dhcp only i added client-id e0/0 .

=========================

Diag : DHCP snooping and tcl script . Same as we all have the documents .


Config old  :  in vtp for SW1 and SW2 it did not mention which vtp mode but stated that vlan information must be saved in startup config which means transparent .

               under switch 3 and switch 4 they tried to play with us .for example SW3 is conncted to R8 et0/1 port in the diagram and ip was of same subnet .
               but in cdp sw3 was connected to r8 e0/2 .and this is the same case with r9 , r10 , r11 . I interchanged the ips of et0/1 and et0/2 on 8 9 10 11 .


               one thing , in old lab device : spanning-tree portfast edge default not supported it was only spanning-tree portfast  default only

               in 45678 they asked not to use virtual name for eigrp but use the strongest authentication available and some key was asked .
                so i used key chain . rest all was normal .
               in shell processing i applied the command : shell processing full but did not get the output as asked .







Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)


Copyright © ITStudyGroup.org 2015-2020

ITStudyGroup.org is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco®, Cisco Systems®, CCDA™, CCNA™, CCDP™, CCNP™, CCIE™ the Cisco Systems logo and the CCIE logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. All other trademarks, including those of Microsoft, CompTIA, VMware, Juniper ISC(2), and CWNP are trademarks of their respective owners.